Software Engineering Research Papers

Specifically, this involves at least adhering to the following three points: Q: Can I disseminate non-blinded version of my submitted work by discussing it with colleagues, giving talks, publishing it at ar Xiv, etc.?You can discuss and present your work that is under submission at small meetings (e.g., job talks, visits to research labs, a Dagstuhl or Shonan meeting), but you should avoid broadly advertising it in a way that reaches the reviewers even if they are not searching for it.

Specifically, this involves at least adhering to the following three points: Q: Can I disseminate non-blinded version of my submitted work by discussing it with colleagues, giving talks, publishing it at ar Xiv, etc.?You can discuss and present your work that is under submission at small meetings (e.g., job talks, visits to research labs, a Dagstuhl or Shonan meeting), but you should avoid broadly advertising it in a way that reaches the reviewers even if they are not searching for it.

Tags: Technology Advances EssayGreat Community Manager Cover LetterCover Letters For Business Development ManagersCover Letter Audit AssistantHow To Write An Good EssayLack Of Education EssayPldt Business PlanBest Topics For Argumentative EssayArgumentative Essay On Television ViolenceWhat Not To Write In A College Admissions Essay

If you have any concerns, please contact the program chairs at [email protected]

If you have questions not answered below, please contact the program chairs at [email protected]: Why Double Blind?

If you have any questions, please see FAQs and/or contact the PC chairs at [email protected]

Authors are encouraged to double check the conflicts of interest on their papers in Hot CRP shortly after the submission deadline. Submissions that do not adhere to these limits or that violate the formatting guidelines will be desk-rejected without review.

There are many reasons for a submission track to employ a double-blind review process – not the least being the considerable number of requests to do so from the community.

For more information on motivation for double-blind reviewing, see Claire Le Goues’ very well argued, referenced, and evidenced blog posting in favor of double-blind review processes for Software Engineering conferences.

You must make every reasonable effort to honor the double-blind review process, but you do not need to guarantee that your identity is undiscoverable.

The double-blind aspect of the review process is not to set up an adversarial identity-discovery process.

See also a list of double-blind resources from Robert Feldt, as well as a more formal study of the subject by Moritz Beller and Alberto Bacchelli.

Q: How to prepare your paper for double-blind reviewing?