Plessy Vs Ferguson Essay

Plessy Vs Ferguson Essay-3
The Court stated that the 14 Amendment could not have been intended to enforce social equality since Caucasians and African Americans do not desire to be commingled.The legislature cannot force desegregation to encourage race equality because it must occur organically.In his points, violence including movement and war, these activities makes US society upheaval.

Tags: Disposable Rocket EssaySample Autobiographical EssayHuman Resources Dissertation QuestionsThe Violent Bear It Away EssaysFormal Letters For Leave ApplicationEssay Grade School WriteChalmers Master Thesis Planning ReportA Separate Peace Dead Poets Society EssayIntro Of EssayDissertation De Philo Sur Le Bonheur

Plessy Vs Ferguson Essay

However, there are different points between Plessy and Brown. Board of Education was educational case of black race, but Plessy v.

This week marks the anniversaries of two landmark Supreme Court cases dealing with segregation. Ferguson, upheld the constitutionality of segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine.

The other high court ruling, nearly six decades later, found that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” An 1892 incident triggered the Plessy lawsuit.

After taking a seat in the Caucasian section, Plessy was asked to move to the African American railway car. Plessy and the Committee of Citizens challenged his arrest and conviction; however, Judge Ferguson found the arrest and conviction to be sound.

The Committee of Citizens appealed the decision of Judge Ferguson to the Louisiana Supreme Court. The Committee of Citizens petitioned to United States Supreme Court on behalf of Plessy. The Supreme Court held that the law is constitutional because if the civil rights of each race are separate but equal, one race cannot be considered inferior on either a political or social level.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Plessy Vs Ferguson Essay

The Latest from auto-znaniya.ru ©