Even this 10 percent may be explained by more recent social science insights into "healthy religious practice" and "unhealthy religious practice." This latter notion will be discussed later -- it is seen generally by most Americans of religious faith as a mispractice of religion.
Unfortunately, the effects of unhealthy religious practice are used to downplay the generally positive influence of religion. This both distorts the true nature of religious belief and practice and causes many policymakers to ignore its positive social consequences.
between those who identify with a church or denomination and those who do not." Four years later, Professor Arland Thornton of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan likewise concluded from a Detroit study of the same relationship that "These data indicate strong intergenerational transmission of religious involvement.
Attendance at religious services is also very stable within generations across time." "With striking consistency, the most religious among us [as Americans] place a greater importance on the full range of family and friendship activities," concluded a Connecticut Mutual Life report in 1982. A group of Kansas State University professors reached the same conclusion: "family commitment is indeed a high priority in many American families and it is frequently accompanied by a concomitant factor of religious commitment." In yet another study conducted during the 1970s and 1980s, professors Nick Stinnet of the University of Alabama and John De Frain of the University of Nebraska sought to identify family strengths.
They saw themselves as active agents of divine providence." Today, he adds, "it is generally accepted that more than half the American people still attend a place of worship over a weekend, an index of religious practice unequaled anywhere in the world, certainly in a great and populous nation." At the heart of religious practice is prayer: Americans pray even more than they go to church.
According to a composite of surveys, 94 percent of blacks, 91 percent of women, 87 percent of whites, and 85 percent of men regard themselves as people who pray regularly.The essays below were written by students to help you with your own studies.If you are looking for help with your essay then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study.Divorce and Cohabitation Regular church attendance is the critical factor in marital stability across denominations and overrides effects of doctrinal teaching on divorce.For instance, black Protestants and white Catholics, who share similarly high church attendance rates, have been shown to have similarly low divorce rates. Furthermore, when marital separation occurs, reconciliation rates are higher among regular church attendees, and highest when both spouses have the same high level of church attendance. Findings on the other end of the marital spectrum reinforce the point: A 1993 national survey of 3,300 men aged 20-39 found that those who switch partners most are those with no religious convictions. Significantly, cohabitation before marriage poses a high risk to later marital stability, and premarital cohabitation is much less common among religious Americans.Some 78 percent pray at least once per week, and 57 percent pray daily.Even among the 13 percent of the population who call themselves agnostics or atheists, some 20 percent pray daily. When policymakers consider America's grave social problems, including violent crime and rising illegitimacy, substance abuse, and welfare dependency, they should heed the findings in the professional literature of the social sciences on the positive consequences that flow from the practice of religion. For example, there is ample evidence that: The overall impact of religious practice is illustrated dramatically in the three most comprehensive systematic reviews of the field. Some 81 percent of the studies showed the positive benefit of religious practice, 15 percent showed neutral effects, and only 4 percent showed harm. Each of these systematic reviews indicated more than 80 percent benefit, and none indicated more than 10 percent harm.Is the decline of religious influence part of what is happening to us?Is it not just possible that anti-religious bias masquerading as religious neutrality is costing more than we have been willing to acknowledge?Middletown [churchgoing] members were more likely to be married, remain married and to be highly satisfied with their marriages and to have more children....The great divide between marriage status, marriage satisfaction and family size is...