Under these considerations the pertinent question is not “Does hunger affect them any less?” as Rachels asks, but “Can I feel their hunger like I feel my own hunger?
Under these considerations the pertinent question is not “Does hunger affect them any less?” as Rachels asks, but “Can I feel their hunger like I feel my own hunger?Tags: Essay On Merits And Demerits Of Mass MediaPapers Research TeachingArgumentative Essay On Cyber Crime LawAssignation DefTopics For Business PlanProblem Solving Games For TeenagersAp World History Change And Continuity EssaysTok Intuition Essay
Since Rachels also considers Randian Ethical Egoism specifically (which he describes as mischaracterizing altruism as something that necessarily puts the interests of others above one’s own), and given the current political climate of this country (where some equate Randian ethics with a moral mandate for a market without government regulation and an end to government subsidies), I wondered what Rachels’ argument would have to say about living in (and perhaps being complicit in) a capitalist country that necessarily creates and perpetuates inequality, which he might call “unacceptably arbitrary.” Would such an economic system necessarily be immoral in his view, rather than just amoral, as it’s often described?
I’m really not entirely sure if Rachels’ moral doctrine of equality conflicts with economic doctrines – I want to hear what other people think.
With reading on the web, people don’t read the entire article and it is seen that they bounce from page to page, losing focus quickly.
Carr uses this information because the reader can relate to it, like himself.
Another example of logos that Carr uses is when a writer, Maryanne Wolf, describes how due to text messaging and cell phones we are experiencing a different type of reading today than in the 1960’s and 70’s; a type of reading that “This is useful in the sense that it is evidence is aimed towards a younger age and therefore can pull in a different audience.
This example, while still logos due to it based on evidence and facts, can also be considered ethos in a sense that he is trying to ‘build a bridge’ in a connection with his audience.
The use of the evidence from the other writers helps to draw in the reader and show them the effects of the internet with the help of reputable resources.
In the article, he states that one of the articles he gained information from had said, “It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense”; that the way we read now is what you would call ‘skimming’ or reading “horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins”.
He compares the differences of the past and the present and how he feels how it has changed not only himself, but others as well and how they are able to comprehend and focus due to the growing nature of the web.
While comparing this, he accumulated research from several credited writers who feel the same way he does about the effects of the web.