It’s not a quirk of fate that decides if someone ends up at the NAACP or the Sessions DOJ.
Even those committed to private sector practice will turn down high-profile work to protect their professional brand.
Learning to strategically consider both sides of an issue may be pedagogically valuable, but only to the extent it allows an advocate to sharpen the argument they want to make.
If a student rips de facto segregation in a hypothetical with a stirring defense of or something, then they’ve failed because they didn’t understand the other side’s argument.
That Albert, a professor who lent his credibility to the conservative argument for hijacking the Supreme Court for a year, thinks it’s perfectly reasonable to ask students to defend segregation doesn’t make it reasonable that other black people would want to spend their afternoon, with their grade hinging on it, preparing a systematic takedown of their own equal rights.
There’s never a question that could disadvantage white students like this.
Marshall managed to get away with this deficiency because of the silence on many issues and the vague wording of the Constitution.
Madison, one of the first Supreme Court cases asserting the power of judicial review, is an effective argument for this power; however, it lacks direct textual basis for the decision.
None for actions that occurred prior to taking office. Impeachment * Treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors * Majority vote from House to impeach, 2/3 from Senate to convict and remove Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Constitutional Law - Bar Exam Outlines.
Privileges/Immunity * Privilege * Executive privilege to keep certain communications secret (national security) * Exception for criminal proceedings if need is demonstrated * Immunity * From civil suits for money damages involving actions that occurred while in office.