However, the key is to ensure that another researcher would be able to replicate the experiment to match yours as closely as possible, but still keeping the section concise.You can assume that anybody reading your paper is familiar with the basic methods, so try not to explain every last detail.
For quantitative research, it is a presentation of the numerical results and data, whereas for qualitative research it should be a broader discussion of trends, without going into too much detail.
For research generating a lot of results, then it is better to include tables or graphs of the analyzed data and leave the raw data in the appendix, so that a researcher can follow up and check your calculations.
Another researcher may have uncovered some interesting trends, but did not manage to reach the significance level, due to experimental error or small sample sizes.
The research problem does not have to be a statement, but must at least imply what you are trying to find.
The third part should give the reader a quick summary of the form that the parts of the research paper is going to take and should include a condensed version of the discussion.
This should be the easiest part of the paper to write, as it is a run-down of the exact design and methodology used to perform the research.Obviously, the exact methodology varies depending upon the exact field and type of experiment.There is a big methodological difference between the apparatus based research of the physical sciences and the methods and observation methods of social sciences.Look at the benefits to be gained by the research or why the problem has not been solved yet.Perhaps nobody has thought about it, or maybe previous research threw up some interesting leads that the previous researchers did not follow up.It begins with general information and undertaking a literature review, and becomes more specific as you nail down a research problem and hypothesis.Finally, it again becomes more general as you try to apply your findings to the world at general.A commentary is essential to linking the results together, rather than just displaying isolated and unconnected charts and figures.It can be quite difficult to find a good balance between the results and the discussion section, because some findings, especially in a quantitative or descriptive experiment, will fall into a grey area. It is best to try to find a middle path, where you give a general overview of the data and then expand on it in the discussion - you should try to keep your own opinions and interpretations out of the results section, saving that for the discussion later on.As long as you have planned a good structure for the parts of a research paper, both approaches are acceptable and it is a matter of preference.A good introduction generally consists of three distinct parts: Ideally, you should try to give each section its own paragraph, but this will vary given the overall length of the paper.